Solvent Extraction for Cobalt Scrap: From Lab to Yard

Discover how solvent extraction technology is transforming cobalt scrap into high-purity, battery-grade metal, driving a more sustainable and secure circular economy.

SUSTAINABLE METALS & RECYCLING INNOVATIONS

TDC Ventures LLC

9/8/202511 min read

Industrial cobalt recycling plant with yellow tanks, blue pipes, and scrap batteries in front.
Industrial cobalt recycling plant with yellow tanks, blue pipes, and scrap batteries in front.

As the global economy accelerates toward electrification and decarbonization, cobalt stands front and center. From powering electric vehicles to energizing next-generation consumer electronics, this critical metal is indispensable to energy transition and supply chain stability. However, mining new cobalt is resource-intensive, often geopolitically fraught, and increasingly difficult to scale. Enter recycling—specifically, solvent extraction (SX) technology. SX promises not only to realize sustainable, circular cobalt flows, but also to deliver battery-grade metal from a complex tapestry of industrial scrap.

In this comprehensive guide, we’ll track the journey of solvent extraction from laboratory proof-of-concept to robust industrial deployments. Along the way, you'll learn about technical maturity, new economic realities, environmental impact, and breakthrough trends that make SX the lynchpin of future-facing cobalt recycling.

1. Understanding Solvent Extraction in Cobalt Recovery

Solvent extraction—a mainstay of hydrometallurgy—efficiently separates and purifies metals using two immiscible liquid phases: an aqueous solution and an organic solvent with selective extractants. Given the explosion of e-waste and spent battery scrap, refining cobalt through SX represents the most chemically precise approach available to recyclers today.

In-Depth Workflow

1. Leaching: Scrap batteries or production offcuts are subjected to acids (often sulfuric or hydrochloric acid) under controlled temperature and agitation. This step dissolves the contained metals, frequently resulting in a multi-metal solution with cobalt, lithium, copper, nickel, and manganese ions intermingled.

2. Extraction: The resulting pregnant leach solution (PLS) is vigorously mixed with an organic solvent containing customized extractants—such as organophosphorus compounds or oximes—that selectively bind cobalt over other metals. This precision is foundational to achieving high-purity outputs suitable for new lithium-ion cells.

3. Stripping: Next, a fresh aqueous strip solution pulls cobalt from the loaded organic phase, generally altering pH or redox conditions to release the metal. Subsequently, hydrometallurgical crystallization, precipitation, or electro-winning can turn the solution into cobalt metal, hydroxide, or sulfate.

Why is Solvent Extraction Vital Now?

With increasing regulatory pressure to limit toxic effluents and ensure high-purity secondary materials, solvent extraction delivers critical competitive advantages:

- Superior purity: Feedstock-agnostic, yet powerful enough to meet rigorous battery and electronics specifications.

- Agility: Adaptable to both post-industrial and end-of-life scrap, mitigating feed variability.

- Selective targeting: Capable of tuning extraction to focus solely on cobalt, leaving problematic impurities behind.

Entity-based focus: Solvent extraction (main entity) works by employing organic extractants (entities) with precise selectivity attributes (EAV: selectivity, pH window, and complexation constant).

2. Evaluating the Maturity of Solvent Extraction for Cobalt Scrap

Laboratory to Pilot Scale: The Expanding Evidence Base

Over the last decade, solvent extraction’s selectivity profile has grown sharper. Modern studies from institutes like the Fraunhofer Society and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory have pushed SX into new frontiers. Scientists now optimize variables such as extractant chemistry, phase ratio, settler residence time, and even temperature regimes to fine-tune cobalt recovery.

Notable Peer-Reviewed Findings:

- Cobalt purity exceeding 99.7% from Li-ion battery leachate, using Cyanex 272 and similar extractants.

- Demonstrated suppression of contaminant uptake—even when iron, copper, and nickel concentrations outpace cobalt by 10-fold.

- Dynamic modeling of extraction isotherms, allowing facilities to predict capacity and selectively engineer for evolving scrap streams.

Pilot-Scale Results: Crossing the Valley of Death

Several firms, including Umicore and American Manganese, have publicized SX pilot runs demonstrating:

- Stable throughput at pilot (up to 100 tons/year)

- Extraction efficiency exceeding 95% with customizable phase contactors (mixer-settlers, pulsed columns)

- Automated sensors for continuous pH and phase separation surveillance, drastically lowering operator intervention

Real-World Case Study:

A Berlin-based recycling startup retrofitted its battery recycling line with SX. After just three months of operation, the plant achieved 98.5% cobalt recovery, reduced process water needs by 30%, and reported zero hazardous solvent discharge events—an operational breakthrough.

Industrial Adoption: A Rising Tide

At the industrial scale, robust process control is paramount:

- Feed variability: Modular, multi-stage SX trains can adapt on-the-fly to changing scrap chemistry.

- Impurity management: Iron (Fe) fouling, a notorious risk, is now mitigated through integrated pre-leach filtration and extractant tailoring.

- Uptime and reliability: Asian facilities—especially in South Korea and Japan—have logged multi-year, 24/7 operation with >96% cobalt recovery rates, validating SX as an industrial workhorse.

Industry Benchmarking:

According to a 2023 survey in the Journal of Cleaner Production, over 60% of battery recycling facilities worldwide now use SX as their primary route to recover cobalt from process scrap and EOL batteries—a testament to its maturity and reliability.

Entity-based:

- Cobalt recovery technology (main entity) ties to industrial and pilot plants (entities), with attributes including throughput capacity, extractant type, and recovery yields (EAV optimized).

3. Capex and Opex Considerations: Economics of Scale-Up

The Numbers Behind the Process

Scaling solvent extraction for cobalt scrap demands shrewd evaluation of both capital and operational expenses.

Capital Expenditure (Capex) Deep-Dive

Modularization and Pre-Fabrication:

Traditional SX builds were custom and slow. Now, modular, skid-mounted SX units are fabricated offsite—with plug-and-play adaptability translating to:

- 20–35% reduction in civil engineering and labor costs (source: McKinsey & Company, 2022)

- Accelerated commissioning: Time-to-operation can drop from 18 to just 9 months

Facility Examples:

- Small Pilot (10–100 t/y): $500,000–$2 million capex.

- Full Commercial Scale (1,000–5,000 t/y): $10–25 million, including auxiliary systems such as solvent storage, air scrubbers, and safety controls.

Operational Expenditure (Opex) Insight

Opex drivers by weight:

1. Solvent/Extractant Losses: Newer, less volatile extractants slash per-ton consumption by 40% over legacy compounds.

2. Power Usage: Pumps, agitators, and compressors draw the bulk of SX plant energy—optimized process scheduling and “off-peak” load shifting can drive down this large expense.

3. Technician Headcount: Modern robotic controls automate phase separation, drop labor by up to 25%.

4. Waste Handling: Residual solutions and spent extractants—now recyclable on-site—mitigate hazardous waste disposal needs.

Benchmark Opex:

$600–$1,200 per cobalt ton (2023 data) for high-throughput operations. For reference, hydrometallurgical precipitation routes often underperform in purity and selectivity, while pyrometallurgical processes can show opex parity, but only at vast scale and with severe GHG footprints.

Comparative Advantage

A 2022 IEA report quantified that SX-based recycling becomes more cost-competitive than new mining once cobalt prices exceed $25,000/ton—a level now consistently surpassed due to demand from automotive and grid storage verticals.

- Capex optimization phrase context: modular SX unit, prefabricated skid, capital recovery period

- Opex context: solvent efficiency, labor automation, energy integration, waste minimization

4) Environmental, EHS & Compliance: Designing SX to Be “Clean by Default”

Solvent extraction can be one of the lowest-impact cobalt-recycling routes—if you engineer it that way from day one. The same chemistry that delivers battery-grade purity also lets you close loops on water, energy, and solvents, cutting both emissions and operating risk.

Low-Temperature, Electrified Processing

SX runs at near-ambient temperatures with electrically driven mixing and pumping. That means most direct (Scope 1) emissions are avoidable, and Scope 2 can be driven down with renewables or a green PPA. Couple the SX train with an electrified leach circuit and electrowinning, and you’ve built a pathway to a very low-carbon cobalt product compared with mining-smelting routes.

Water Stewardship Without Hand-Waving

Counter-current washing: Design for ≥3 wash stages to minimize dissolved metals carry-over and slash fresh-water make-up.

Recycle trains: Treat rinse and raffinate with ultrafiltration + RO or ion exchange, then loop permeate back to process; purge only what’s necessary for salts balance.

Real-time conductivity & ORP control: Stops you from “over-washing” and wasting utilities.

Solvent Management That Prevents Headlines

Low-volatility extractants & diluents: Specify modern formulations to reduce fugitive losses at the source.

Closed hoods and condensers on mixers/settlers: Capture vapors; route to carbon beds or thermal oxidizers where required.

Housekeeping by design: Drip trays, graded floors, and double-contained pipework keep small leaks from becoming environmental incidents.

Analytics that matter: Track solvent loss in g/L of PLS treated; aim for continuous improvement to single-digit losses per thousand liters.

Effluent & Residues: Treat to a Standard, Not a Slogan

Raffinate polishing: Stage selective precipitation (Fe/Al), then polish with IX/membranes to hit discharge permits consistently.

Side-product valorization where chemistry allows: For example, bleed streams rich in Mn or Ni can be diverted to saleable salts—only if impurity specs and market logistics pencil out.

Neutralization & solid residues: Engineer filterability early (floc/settling tests at pilot), and design covered storage to prevent re-entrainment.

Safety & Process Risk (EHS)

HAZOP/LOPA at pilot and pre-startup: Focus nodes on phase-separation upsets, static discharge, and incompatible chemical additions.

Inherently safer choices: Anti-static materials, nitrogen blanketing on storage, and ATEX/IECEx compliance for any classified areas.

Operator exposure: Closed sampling loops and quick-connects; swap open dippers for inline analyzers wherever possible.

Compliance & Market Access (What Buyers Will Ask For)

Battery-passport-ready data: Every lot needs a digital trail—feed origin, mass balance, energy mix, recovery yields, impurity profiles.

Due-diligence frameworks: Align to RMI/RMAP for cobalt, ISO 9001/14001/45001 for systems, and publish an annual LCA summary that customers can cite.

Regulatory trajectory: Global regimes are tightening on recycled-content, recovery-efficiency, and due-diligence requirements. Build your SX KPIs to map to these audits so you aren’t retrofitting documentation later.

KPIs That Prove You’re “Green for Real”

Recovery efficiency (Co): ≥96% sustained, with Ni/Cu carry-over tightly bounded.

Energy intensity: kWh per tonne Co recovered (track by unit operation).

Water intensity: m³ per tonne, with recycle ratio and purge clearly reported.

Solvent loss rate: g per 1,000 L PLS processed.

VOC emissions: mg/Nm³ at vents (captured vs. uncontrolled).

Safety: TRIR and near-miss closure rates, not just LTIs.

Digital Backbone for Assurance

Online analytics: pH, ORP, density, turbidity, and interface cameras on settlers.

Metals monitoring: Inline XRF/ICP-OES at critical take-off points; SPC charts drive corrective actions before specs drift.

Historian + LIMS: One source of truth for mass-energy balance, passport data, and audit trails.

What “Good” Looks Like at 12 Months

A right-sized SX line that:

Hits battery-grade cobalt specs consistently with >96% recovery.

Recycles >70% of process water and reports solvent loss in the low single-digit g/1,000 L range.

Publishes a third-party-reviewed LCA and maintains RMAP conformance, with a live battery-passport data feed to customers.

Entity-based: Environmental performance (main entity) with attributes: energy intensity (kWh/t), water intensity (m³/t), solvent loss (g/1,000 L), VOC emissions (mg/Nm³), Co recovery (%), and audit conformity (RMAP/ISO status).

5) Pilot-to-Plant Commissioning Playbook: From First Drops to Nameplate

Bringing SX from a clean pilot skid to a full, humming line is less “flip the switch” and more “conduct the orchestra.” The goal is simple: hit battery-grade cobalt on spec, on yield, and on schedule—without burning solvent, operators, or goodwill. Here’s the playbook seasoned plants follow.

Define the Design Basis (and Lock It)

Everything downstream lives or dies by the design basis. Freeze it before steel is cut.

Feed envelope: Chemistry ranges for Co, Ni, Mn, Cu, Fe, Al; pH/temperature limits; expected solids load after pre-leach filtration.

Product slate: Cobalt sulfate vs hydroxide vs metal; spec windows for trace metals (e.g., Ni < 100 ppm), moisture, and crystal habit (if precipitated).

Throughput curves: Minimum turndown (often 40–50%), ramp steps, and nameplate rate with O:A ratios and stage counts defined.

Utilities & EHS constraints: Max kWh/t, water recycle targets, VOC capture capacity, and permitted discharge limits.

Lab→Pilot Translation: Prove the Isotherm (Again)

Bench and pilot taught you the chemistry; now harden it for the real world.

Isotherm confirmation: Re-run McCabe–Thiele work on the actual startup leachate. Confirm stage count and operating lines at the intended O:A.

Selectivity stress: Spike Fe, Ni, and Mn to upper-bound levels to verify organic loading and scrubbing capacity.

Emulsion propensity: Agitate at plant-level shear to test for crud and entrainment. Trial coalescers and phase-separation aids if needed.

Strip robustness: Validate that the strip solution pulls Co efficiently at target pH/redox—and that downstream crystallization/EW hits spec.

Pre-Commissioning: Make “Cold” Count

Dry and wet tests eliminate 80% of commissioning pain.

Mechanical completion & loop checks: Every pump, agitator, valve, flowmeter, level transmitter, interlock. Simulate trips and prove failsafe states.

Hydrostatic & water runs: Fill, circulate, and drain water through the whole train. Map residence times; tune weirs to keep interfaces stable.

Control philosophy walk-through: Alarm setpoints, permissives, and auto-/manual transitions. Operators should solve “what-ifs” on paper before touching solvent.

Organic In, Eyes Wide Open

Your first contact with solvent sets the tone.

Organic conditioning: Pre-wash the organic with demin water and a low-impurity synthetic PLS to remove fines and polar contaminants.

Solvent loss baselining: Start a daily balance (make-up vs measured inventory). Early detection of losses saves both cost and drama.

VOC & safety proof: Hood flows, condensers, and carbon beds in spec; verify LEL monitors and anti-static bonding/grounding.

Hot Commissioning: Three Ramps, Three Gates

Think of hot runs as three gates you must clear—stability, quality, and capacity—in that order.

Stability Gate (Low-Rate Steady State)

Run at ~40–50% of nameplate until phase boundaries behave like clockwork.

Interfaces and coalescence are repeatable.

pH, ORP, and temperature control loops hold without manual riding.

No visible crud mats; entrainment below target (e.g., <200 ppm aqueous in organic, <150 ppm organic in aqueous).

Quality Gate (Spec on Spec)

While still at reduced rate, prove product specs.

Cobalt recovery: ≥96% over a rolling 24–48 hours.

Impurity profile: Within buyer spec; demonstrate corrective actions if Ni/Cu breakthrough occurs.

Downstream conversion: If crystallizing CoSO₄ or precipitating Co(OH)₂, verify crystal size distribution and filtration rates meet packaging/logistics needs.

Data pack: Generate a first-article certification: full ICP panel, moisture, morphology (if relevant), and batch traceability.

Capacity Gate (March to Nameplate)

Increase feed in steps (e.g., +10–15% per day). At each step, repeat a shortened stability + quality check.

Verify the mixer power draw is within spec and settlers aren’t flooding.

Monitor solvent losses; they often rise with throughput—act early (coalescers, residence time, shear reduction).

Confirm energy and water intensities scale linearly or better (no hidden recycles choking you).

Control, Instrumentation & Analytics That Keep You Honest

SX lives and dies by interfaces and pH, but modern lines measure more—and are safer for it.

Critical online tags: pH/ORP at extraction and strip, interface levels in each settler, density on raffinate/loaded organic, turbidity at phase outlets.

Smart alarms, not alarm floods: Rate-of-change alerts for pH and interface drift; alarm deadbands tuned so operators respond to real issues.

Inline metals monitoring: Periodic grab samples feed ICP, but inline XRF/fast OES at key points gives trend intelligence between lab results.

Historian & SPC: Track recovery, impurity breakthroughs, solvent loss, and energy/water intensity. Use control charts to trigger corrective actions before specs drift.

Emulsions, Crud & Other Gremlins: A Fast Response Play

Even great circuits meet bad days. You need choreography, not improvisation.

Emulsions: Reduce shear (impeller rpm), adjust O:A, dose demulsifier, and check for surfactant contamination from upstream cleaners.

Crud: Skim to a dedicated re-processing loop; add clay treatment or activated carbon; audit pre-leach filtration for fines.

Iron fouling: Tighten pre-oxidation/precipitation of Fe, raise extraction pH window cautiously, and refresh a side-stream of organic if loading curves shift.

Entrained organic in aqueous: Deploy coalescers or plate separators; increase settler residence time; verify weir settings.

Off-Spec Handling: Keep Quality Sacred

You will make off-spec during learning curves; decide now what happens to it.

Re-work logic: Clear decision tree—polish via re-extraction vs blend into next batch vs downgrade sale.

Segregated tanks: Physical capacity to isolate suspect lots; never contaminate a good batch to “make averages work.”

Customer communication: Pre-agreed re-test and re-certification protocol avoids shipment delays turning into commercial disputes.

First-Article Qualification (FAQ) for Battery Buyers

Crossing this line unlocks revenue.

Lot stringency: Produce 3–5 consecutive lots on spec with tight variation; show worst-case feed within the agreed envelope.

Full disclosure package: Process map, mass/energy balance, emissions summary, solvent loss rate, and QA procedures.

Downstream validation: Some buyers will run cathode precursor tests; be ready to supply retain samples and rapid analytics support.

Digital passport: Deliver machine-readable batch data (origin, LCA summary, recovery yields, impurity panel) aligned to their battery-passport schema.

People, SOPs, and the Quiet Power of Training

Plants don’t start up—people do.

Role clarity: Panel operators own interfaces and pH; field techs own housekeeping and leak checks; lab owns spec release.

SOP maturity: Start with detailed steps; tighten to “critical-few” checklists once muscle memory forms.

Post-shift huddles: A 10-minute stand-up to capture deviations and assign fixes prevents recurring gremlins.

The 30/60/90-Day Proving Plan

Make success visible—and bankable.

Day 0–30: Stable operation at ≥70% rate, ≥96% recovery, solvent loss trending downward, no environmental exceedances.

Day 31–60: Hit nameplate; publish a preliminary LCA and utilities baseline; close top three Pareto losses (energy, solvent, re-work).

Day 61–90: Demonstrate turndown to 50% without quality loss; finalize preventative maintenance windows; lock supplier FAQ status.

Entity-based: Commissioning program (main entity) with attributes: feed envelope (chemistry ranges), stage count/O:A (process settings), ramp plan (capacity steps), quality gates (spec windows), solvent loss KPI (g/1,000 L), energy & water intensity (kWh/m³; m³/t), and first-article status (qualified/not qualified).